Action Recycling Inc. v. USA, et al

Petitioner - Appellant,: ACTION RECYCLING INC.
Respondent - Appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HEATHER BLAIR, IRS Agent
Case Number: 12-35338
Filed: April 30, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: IRS 3rd Party Suits 26 USC 7609

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 9, 2013 Summary Action Recycling, Inc. v. United States

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 9, 2013 9125112389 Opinion or Order of the Court FILED OPINION (ARTHUR L. ALARCON, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and SANDRA S. IKUTA) AFFIRMED. Judge: MMM Authoring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [8695369]
Search for this case: Action Recycling Inc. v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: ACTION RECYCLING INC.
Represented By: Charles H. Hammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Adam D. Strait
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: HEATHER BLAIR, IRS Agent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.