Floyd Mayes v. Jim Bartlett

Floyd Mayes v. Jim Bartlett

Petitioner - Appellant,:	FLOYD M. MAYES
Respondent - Appellee,:	JIM BARTLETT
Case Number:	12-35461
Filed:	June 6, 2012
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
March 27, 2014	Mayes v. Premo
August 21, 2014	FLOYD MAYES V. JEFF PREMO

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 21, 2014	Filing 9026306346 Filed order and amended opinion (HARRY PREGERSON, MARY H. MURGUIA and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN). The Opinion filed March 27, 2014, and appearing at 747 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 2014), is hereby amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order. With these amendments, Judges Murguia and Christen have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and Judge Pregerson has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Appellee s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed May 16, 2014, is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be permitted. [9213089]

Date Filed

Document Text

August 21, 2014

Filing 9026306346 Filed order and amended opinion (HARRY PREGERSON, MARY H. MURGUIA and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN). The Opinion filed March 27, 2014, and appearing at 747 F.3d 686 (9th Cir. 2014), is hereby amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order. With these amendments, Judges Murguia and Christen have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and Judge Pregerson has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Appellee s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed May 16, 2014, is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be permitted. [9213089]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Floyd Mayes v. Jim Bartlett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: FLOYD M. MAYES
Represented By:	Nell Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: JIM BARTLETT
Represented By:	Nicholas M. Kallstrom
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?