Inhale, Inc. v. Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc., et al
Plaintiff - Appellant,: INHALE, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant - Appellee,: STARBUZZ TOBACCO, INC., a California Corporation and WAEL SALIM ELHALAWANI, an individual residing in California
Case Number: 12-56331
Filed: July 19, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 9, 2014 Summary Inhale, Inc. v. Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.
June 3, 2014 Summary INHALE, INC. V. STARBUZZ TOBACCO, INC.
July 9, 2014 Summary INHALE, INC. V. STARBUZZ TOBACCO, INC.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9026185398 Filed order and amended opinion (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SUSAN P. GRABER and CARLOS T. BEA). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED/REMANDED. The opinion filed June 3, 2014, and published at F.3d , 2014 WL 2465052, is amended as follows: On slip opinion page 8, lines 5 6 of footnote 2, replace <Under some interpretations of 17 U.S.C. 101, distinctiveness of shape would be relevant. See, e.g., Brandir> with <Under some interpretations of 17 U.S.C. 101, distinctiveness of shape, alone, would be relevant if not the product of industrial design, thereby requiring the trier of fact to examine not only the object but also the design process. Brandir>. On slip opinion page 9, after <within its shape >, replace <because the shape accomplishes the function> with <insofar as the shape accomplishes the function>. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. [9161081]
June 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9026084645 Filed order and amended opinion (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SUSAN P. GRABER and CARLOS T. BEA). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED;The opinion filed January 9, 2014, and published at 739 F.3d 446, is amended as follows: (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained. Starbuzz s request for an award of attorneys fees under 17 U.S.C. 505 is GRANTED. We award attorneys fees incurred in responding to the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc to Starbuzz in an amount to be determined by the district court on remand. [9117278]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Inhale, Inc. v. Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: INHALE, INC., a California Corporation
Represented By: Louis F. Teran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: STARBUZZ TOBACCO, INC., a California Corporation
Represented By: Natu J. Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: WAEL SALIM ELHALAWANI, an individual residing in California
Represented By: Natu J. Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?