Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton

Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton

Plaintiff - Appellee,:	HENDRICKS & LEWIS PLLC, a Washington professional limited liability company
Defendant - Appellant,:	GEORGE CLINTON, an individual
Case Number:	13-35010
Filed:	January 7, 2013
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
June 23, 2014	Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. Clinton
August 26, 2014	Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. Clinton

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 26, 2014	Filing 9026319323 Filed order and amended opinion (RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The Opinion filed June 23, 2014 is hereby amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order. With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Gould and Christen have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Fisher has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Defendant-Appellant s petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. [9218787]

Date Filed

Document Text

August 26, 2014

Filing 9026319323 Filed order and amended opinion (RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED; The Opinion filed June 23, 2014 is hereby amended. The amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order. With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Gould and Christen have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Fisher has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Defendant-Appellant s petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. [9218787]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee,: HENDRICKS & LEWIS PLLC, a Washington professional limited liability company
Represented By:	F. Ross Boundy
Represented By:	Katherine Hendricks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant,: GEORGE CLINTON, an individual
Represented By:	Eric Michael Fong
Represented By:	Jeffrey P. Thennisch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?