Enrique Godoy v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.

Petitioner - Appellant,: ENRIQUE ANTHONY GODOY
Respondent - Appellee,: DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden
Case Number: 13-56024
Filed: June 13, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 25, 2016 Summary Godoy v. Spearman
March 2, 2017 Summary ENRIQUE GODOY V. MARION SPEARMAN
June 30, 2017 Summary Godoy v. Spearman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 2, 2017 9028823367 Opinion or Order of the Court Filed Order for PUBLICATION (SIDNEY R. THOMAS) Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. [10339737]
Search for this case: Enrique Godoy v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant,: ENRIQUE ANTHONY GODOY
Represented By: Enrique Anthony Godoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee,: DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden
Represented By: Stephanie Miyoshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?