Whitney Duenez, et al v. Whitney Duenez, et al
| WHITNEY DUENEZ, individually and as successor-in-interest for Decedent Ernesto Duenez, Jr., D. D., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Whitney Duenez, ROSEMARY DUENEZ, individually and ERNESTO DUENEZ, Sr., individually |
| CITY OF MANTECA, a municipal corporation, DAVID BRICKER, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Manteca and JOHN MOODY, Police Officer |
| 14-15049 |
| January 13, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Whitney Duenez, et al v. Whitney Duenez, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: WHITNEY DUENEZ, individually and as successor-in-interest for Decedent Ernesto Duenez, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | John L. Burris |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: D. D., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Whitney Duenez | |
| Represented By: | John L. Burris |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: ROSEMARY DUENEZ, individually | |
| Represented By: | John L. Burris |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: ERNESTO DUENEZ, Sr., individually | |
| Represented By: | John L. Burris |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: CITY OF MANTECA, a municipal corporation | |
| Represented By: | Sean C. Conley |
| Represented By: | Austin R. Gibbons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: DAVID BRICKER, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Manteca | |
| Represented By: | Sean C. Conley |
| Represented By: | Austin R. Gibbons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: JOHN MOODY, Police Officer | |
| Represented By: | Sean C. Conley |
| Represented By: | Austin R. Gibbons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
