Keith Dunbar, et al v. Google Inc.
| KEITH DUNBAR, ROBERT FREAD, RAPHAEL CARRILLO, BRAD SCOTT, TODD HARRINGTON, MATTHEW C. KNOWLES, BRENT MATTHEW SCOTT, RONALD KOVLER and A.K. |
| GOOGLE INC. |
| 14-80044 |
| April 2, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) Petitioners’ motion to seal the petition for permission to appeal is granted. Respondent’s request to seal the appendix in support of the opposition to the petition for permission to appeal is granted. The court, in its discretion, denies the petition for permission to appeal the district court’s March 18, 2014 order denying class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). [9091737] (BJB) |
| Filing 6 Received UNDER SEAL Respondent Google Inc. Appendix (Volume 1 of 4) [9062541] (JFF) |
| Filing 5 Received Respondent Google Inc. notice of filing appendix under seal. [9062413] (JFF) |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Respondent Google Inc. answer to 23f petition. Date of service: 04/14/2014. [9056846] (MGR) |
| Filing 3 Terminated Maco Stewart for Google Inc. in 14-80044 (no longer with firm) [9043245] (RY) |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioners A.K., Raphael Carrillo, Keith Dunbar, Robert Fread, Todd Harrington, Matthew C. Knowles, Ronald Kovler, Brad Scott and Brent Matthew Scott motion to SEAL Petition for Permission to Appeal the Denial of Class Certification Pursuant to Fed. R. CIV. P. 23(f). Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/01/2014. [9042285][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,- 04/03/2014 by BY] (BY) |
| Filing 1 FILED ON 04/01/2014 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f) WITH 2 VOLUMES OF EXHIBITS. SERVED ON 04/01/2014. [9042272][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,- 04/03/2014 by BY] (BY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
