USA v. Joseph Arpaio

USA v. Joseph Arpaio

Plaintiff - Appellee,:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant,:	JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff
Case Number:	17-10448
Filed:	October 20, 2017
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
April 17, 2018	United States v. Arpaio
June 1, 2018	USA V. JOSEPH ARPAIO
October 10, 2018	USA V. JOSEPH ARPAIO
February 27, 2020	United States v. Arpaio

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 1, 2018	Filing 9030064915 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator): A judge has made a sua sponte request for a vote on whether to rehear en banc the published order dated April 17, 2018 by a motions panel of this Court appointing a special prosecutor to defend the district court s denial of defendant Arpaio s request for vacatur of his criminal contempt conviction. United States v. Arpaio, 887 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2018). Therefore, pursuant to General Order 5.4(c)(3), the parties are requested to file simultaneous briefs setting forth their respective positions on whether or not the order should be reheard en banc. Specifically, the parties are directed to address the question as to whether the Court has the authority, either pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 42(a)(2) or under its inherent authority, to appoint a special prosecutor under the circumstances presented by this case. The briefs are not to exceed 7,000 words and shall be filed within 21 days of the date of this order. Amici are permitted, but not required, to file a brief within 21 days of the date of this order not to exceed 7,000 words stating their positions on whether the order should be reheard en banc. Parties or Amici who are registered for appellate electronic case filing must file the response electronically without submission of paper copies. Parties or Amici who are not registered appellate electronic case filing filers must file 50 paper copies. [10892715]
April 17, 2018	Filing 9029942107 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) (Dissent by Judge Tallman) This case is on appeal from the district court s denial of Defendant-Appellant s request for vacatur of his conviction for criminal contempt. The validity of the district court s denial will be addressed by the merits panel assigned to this case. We address only the question of whether to appoint a special prosecutor to defend the district court s decision in light of the United States letter informing this Court that [t]he government does not intend to defend the district court s order. For the reasons discussed below, we will appoint a special prosecutor to provide briefing and argument to the merits panel. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) We will appoint special counsel and address all other pending motions by separate order. SO ORDERED. [10839081]

Date Filed

Document Text

June 1, 2018

Filing 9030064915 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator): A judge has made a sua sponte request for a vote on whether to rehear en banc the published order dated April 17, 2018 by a motions panel of this Court appointing a special prosecutor to defend the district court s denial of defendant Arpaio s request for vacatur of his criminal contempt conviction. United States v. Arpaio, 887 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2018). Therefore, pursuant to General Order 5.4(c)(3), the parties are requested to file simultaneous briefs setting forth their respective positions on whether or not the order should be reheard en banc. Specifically, the parties are directed to address the question as to whether the Court has the authority, either pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 42(a)(2) or under its inherent authority, to appoint a special prosecutor under the circumstances presented by this case. The briefs are not to exceed 7,000 words and shall be filed within 21 days of the date of this order. Amici are permitted, but not required, to file a brief within 21 days of the date of this order not to exceed 7,000 words stating their positions on whether the order should be reheard en banc. Parties or Amici who are registered for appellate electronic case filing must file the response electronically without submission of paper copies. Parties or Amici who are not registered appellate electronic case filing filers must file 50 paper copies. [10892715]

April 17, 2018

Filing 9029942107 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) (Dissent by Judge Tallman) This case is on appeal from the district court s denial of Defendant-Appellant s request for vacatur of his conviction for criminal contempt. The validity of the district court s denial will be addressed by the merits panel assigned to this case. We address only the question of whether to appoint a special prosecutor to defend the district court s decision in light of the United States letter informing this Court that [t]he government does not intend to defend the district court s order. For the reasons discussed below, we will appoint a special prosecutor to provide briefing and argument to the merits panel. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) We will appoint special counsel and address all other pending motions by separate order. SO ORDERED. [10839081]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Joseph Arpaio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	John D. Keller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant,: JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff
Represented By:	John Wilenchik
Represented By:	Mark D. Goldman
Represented By:	Dennis I. Wilenchik
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?