Javanni Munguia-Brown, et al v. Equity Residential, et al
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, EQR-WOODLAND PARK B LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, EQR-WOODLAND PARK A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a partnership and EQUITY RESIDENTIAL, a real estate investment trust |
DAVID BONFANTI, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, NORMA RODRIGUEZ, on behalf of others similarly situated, ANGELINA MAGANA, on behalf of others similarly situated and JAVANNI MUNGUIA-BROWN, on behalf of others similarly situated |
17-80233 |
November 7, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and CARLOS T. BEA): The court, in its discretion, denies the petition for permission to appeal the district courts October 23, 2017 order granting class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005). [10735453] (AF) [Entered: 01/23/2018 03:31 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Respondents David Bonfanti, Angelina Magana, Javanni Munguia-Brown and Norma Rodriguez answer to 23f petition. Date of service: 11/16/2017. [10657847] [17-80233] (Jhaveri-Weeks, William) [Entered: 11/16/2017 04:37 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Petitioners EQR-Woodland Park A Limited Partnership, EQR-Woodland Park B Limited Partnership, ERP Operating Limited Partnership, Equity Residential and Equity Residential Management, LLC Corporate Disclosure Statement. Served on 11/06/2017. [10645690] (HC) [Entered: 11/07/2017 09:31 AM] |
Filing 1 FILED ON 11/06/2017 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 11/06/2017. [10645677] (HC) [Entered: 11/07/2017 09:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.