U.S. Bank N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
| U.S. BANK N.A., Solely as Trustee re: Holders of the Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-Ac1, Asset Backed Ceritifcates, Series 2006-Ac1 |
| SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC |
| 18-16470 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: U.S. Bank N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant,: U.S. BANK N.A., Solely as Trustee re: Holders of the Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-Ac1, Asset Backed Ceritifcates, Series 2006-Ac1 | |
| Represented By: | E. Daniel Kidd |
| Represented By: | Dana Jonathon Nitz |
| Represented By: | Lindsay Nicole Demery Robbins |
| Represented By: | Christopher Alan James Swift |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee,: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Diana S. Ebron |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline A. Gilbert |
| Represented By: | Karen Hanks |
| Represented By: | Howard C. Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
