Bruce Cahill v. Olivia Karpinski, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRUCE CAHILL
Defendant / Appellee: OLIVIA KARPINSKI and PAUL PEJMAN EDALAT
Case Number: 18-55332
Filed: March 14, 2018
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2019 Filing 20 MANDATE ISSUED. (RMG and RAP) [11198011] (RR) [Entered: 02/15/2019 04:37 PM]
January 24, 2019 Filing 19 Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD A. PAEZ) Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 16 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Appellees request for fees and costs, contained within the filing at Docket Entry No. 17, is denied DISMISSED.[11165372] (WL) [Entered: 01/24/2019 01:42 PM]
August 27, 2018 Filing 18 Filed (ECF) Appellant Bruce Cahill reply to response (). Date of service: 08/27/2018. [10989941] [18-55332] (Markham, John) [Entered: 08/27/2018 07:47 AM]
August 21, 2018 Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellees Paul Pejman Edalat and Olivia Karpinski response to motion ([ # 16 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 16 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 08/21/2018. [10983632] [18-55332] (Kashani, Saied) [Entered: 08/21/2018 11:09 AM]
August 20, 2018 Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Appellant Bruce Cahill Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 08/20/2018. [10982790] [18-55332] (Markham, John) [Entered: 08/20/2018 04:10 PM]
August 13, 2018 Filing 15 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 14 ] submitted by Paul Pejman Edalat and Olivia Karpinski is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10974162] (KT) [Entered: 08/13/2018 09:57 AM]
August 10, 2018 Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Paul Pejman Edalat and Olivia Karpinski. Date of service: 08/10/2018. [10973858] [18-55332] (Kashani, Saied) [Entered: 08/10/2018 11:44 PM]
August 1, 2018 Filing 13 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The appellees opposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due August 10, 2018. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Appellees counsel is reminded that a motion for an extension of time to file a brief should include the position of the opposing party or explain why that information is not available. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b)(6). (Pro Mo) [10962239] (MS) [Entered: 08/01/2018 09:56 AM]
May 30, 2018 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Bruce Cahill reply to response (). Date of service: 05/30/2018. [10888830] [18-55332] (Markham, John) [Entered: 05/30/2018 07:02 AM]
May 29, 2018 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellees Paul Pejman Edalat and Olivia Karpinski reply to response (motion to extend time to file brief, ). Date of service: 05/29/2018. [10888800] [18-55332] (Kashani, Saied) [Entered: 05/29/2018 10:37 PM]
May 24, 2018 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Bruce Cahill response opposing motion ([ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to extend time to file brief). Date of service: 05/24/2018. [10884970] [18-55332] (Markham, John) [Entered: 05/24/2018 02:17 PM]
May 23, 2018 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellees Paul Pejman Edalat and Olivia Karpinski Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 08/10/2018. Date of service: 05/23/2018. [10883880] [18-55332] (Kashani, Saied) [Entered: 05/23/2018 05:20 PM]
May 18, 2018 Filing 8 Received 7 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 4 ] filed by Bruce Cahill. [10878126] (DB) [Entered: 05/18/2018 02:12 PM]
May 18, 2018 Filing 7 Filed 4 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 5 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Bruce Cahill. [10877979] (KT) [Entered: 05/18/2018 01:30 PM]
May 14, 2018 Filing 6 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 4 ] submitted by Bruce Cahill is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. The Court has reviewed the excerpts of record [ # 5 ] submitted by Bruce Cahill. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [10871198] (KT) [Entered: 05/14/2018 11:27 AM]
May 11, 2018 Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Bruce Cahill. Date of service: 05/11/2018. [10870116] [18-55332] (Markham, John) [Entered: 05/11/2018 02:47 PM]
May 11, 2018 Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Bruce Cahill. Date of service: 05/11/2018. [10870107] [18-55332] (Markham, John) [Entered: 05/11/2018 02:46 PM]
March 23, 2018 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact circuit mediator to discuss services available through the court's mediation program, to request a settlement assessment conf, or to request a stay of the appeal for settlement purposes. Also, upon agreement of the parties, the brfing sch can be modified or vacated to facilitate settlement discussions. Csl are requested to send copies of this order to their clients. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [10811321] (BLS) [Entered: 03/23/2018 05:29 PM]
March 15, 2018 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Bruce Cahill Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/15/2018. [10799149] [18-55332] (Markham, John) [Entered: 03/15/2018 09:40 AM]
March 14, 2018 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/21/2018. Appellant Bruce Cahill opening brief due 05/14/2018. Appellees Paul Pejman Edalat and Olivia Karpinski answering brief due 06/11/2018. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [10797933] (JBS) [Entered: 03/14/2018 11:28 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bruce Cahill v. Olivia Karpinski, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BRUCE CAHILL
Represented By: John J. E. Markham II
Represented By: Elizabeth Louise Read
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OLIVIA KARPINSKI
Represented By: Saied Kashani Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAUL PEJMAN EDALAT
Represented By: Saied Kashani Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?