Cheryl Nolte Barnes v. Clark County, et al
CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION, CLARK COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada and MCCARRAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT |
CHERYL NOLTE BARNES, Qui Tam Relator; ex rel. United States of America |
19-15720 |
April 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SM): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 11268453-2 ]) to consolidate Nos. 18-15201 and 19-15720 is granted. Nos. 18-15201 and 19-15720 shall proceed as consolidated appeals with a joint briefing schedule. The consolidated briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the consolidated opening brief is due June 10, 2019; the consolidated answering brief is due July 9, 2019; the optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. Appellees request (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ] in No. 19-15720) for separate briefing is denied. The parties shall file consolidated briefs. Appellees request (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 5 ] and [ # 7 ] in No. 19-15720) to file an oversized consolidated answering brief is denied without prejudice to filing a renewed motion accompanied by a copy of the proposed oversized consolidated answering brief on July 9, 2019. [11287776] [18-15201, 19-15720] (AF) [Entered: 05/06/2019 01:54 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees Clark County, Clark County Department of Aviation and McCarran International Airport response opposing motion ([ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to consolidate cases). Date of service: 05/02/2019. [11285301] [19-15720] (Bielinski, Laura) [Entered: 05/02/2019 04:13 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Cheryl Nolte Barnes reply to response (motion to consolidate cases, ). Date of service: 04/29/2019. [11280696] [19-15720] (Ray, Paul) [Entered: 04/29/2019 02:20 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Clark County, Clark County Department of Aviation and McCarran International Airport response opposing motion ([ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 04/24/2019. [11275934] [19-15720] (Lenhard, Kirk) [Entered: 04/24/2019 02:56 PM] |
Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/17/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11268024] (AD) [Entered: 04/17/2019 06:44 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Cheryl Nolte Barnes Unopposed Motion to consolidate cases 18-15201 and 19-15720. Date of service: 04/17/2019. [11268001] [19-15720] (Ray, Paul) [Entered: 04/17/2019 06:03 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Cheryl Nolte Barnes Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/17/2019. [11267999] [19-15720] (Ray, Paul) [Entered: 04/17/2019 05:57 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/18/2019. Appellant Cheryl Nolte Barnes opening brief due 06/10/2019. Appellees Clark County, Clark County Department of Aviation and McCarran International Airport answering brief due 07/09/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11260393] (HH) [Entered: 04/11/2019 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.