Georgette Purnell v. Rudolph and Sletten, Inc., et al
| GEORGETTE G. PURNELL |
| RUDOLPH AND SLETTEN, INC. and SERVICE WEST, INC. |
| 19-15768 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, WAF and PJW) [11298148] (QDL) [Entered: 05/15/2019 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and PAUL J. WATFORD) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Medhekar v. United States Dist. Court, 99 F.3d 325, 326 (9th Cir. 1996) (discovery orders not immediately appealable); United States v. Washington, 573 F.2d 1121, 1122 (9th Cir. 1978) (order denying motion to disqualify judge is not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11273583] (JBS) [Entered: 04/23/2019 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Georgette G. Purnell opening brief due 06/14/2019. Appellees Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. and Service West, Inc. answering brief due 07/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11266300] (RT) [Entered: 04/16/2019 04:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
