Francisca Flores v. Stephen Morris, et al
| DORINDA HAYES, PHILIP CHANEY, JEREMY WILLIAMS, JESSICA ENO, STEPHEN MORRIS, VIRGINIA GOMEZ, KENNETH FILLY and BRIANA BURDEN |
| FRANCISCA FLORES, as the Personal Representative of the estate of Lino Flores |
| 19-15817 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (SMC): An in-person mediation will be held on July 17, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., at Gust Rosenfeld, P.L.C., One E. Washington Street, Suite 1600, Phoenix, Arizona [telephone (602) 257-7422]. Unless excused by the Circuit Mediator prior to the scheduled conference, each party shall be represented by counsel of record and a client representative having full authority to negotiate and settle the case on any terms at the conference. Mediation statements no longer than 10 pages shall be submitted to the Circuit Mediator via e-mail [Sasha_M_Cummings@ca9.uscourts.gov] on or before July 10, 2019, by 12:00 p.m. (noon). Should a party require more than 10 pages for their mediation brief, counsel should contact the Circuit Mediator prior to thedate for submission to discuss such. Mediation statements shall be double-spaced, and may contain brief statements of the following... Mediation statements shall not be filed with the court. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is revised as follows: appellant shall file an opening brief on or before August 16, 2019; appellees shall file an answering brief on or before September 16, 2019; appellant may file an optional reply brief within twenty one (21) days from the service date of the answering brief. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [11318279] (WL) [Entered: 06/04/2019 07:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/22/2019, 11:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11283995] (BS) [Entered: 05/01/2019 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/25/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11277242] (AD) [Entered: 04/25/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Francisca Flores Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/25/2019. [11276660] [19-15817] (Jacob, Devon) [Entered: 04/25/2019 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 Added attorney Garrick Lloyd Gallagher for Virginia Gomez, in case 19-15817. [11276228] (RR) [Entered: 04/24/2019 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Garrick L. Gallagher for Appellee Virginia Gomez. Date of service: 04/23/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11274370] [19-15817] (Gallagher, Garrick) [Entered: 04/23/2019 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/26/2019. Appellant Francisca Flores opening brief due 06/18/2019. Appellees Briana Burden, Philip Chaney, Jessica Eno, Kenneth Filly, Virginia Gomez, Dorinda Hayes, Stephen Morris and Jeremy Williams answering brief due 07/18/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11270182] (JPD) [Entered: 04/19/2019 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
