Michael Mau, Jr. v. Clark Ducart, et al
| M. ROBERTS, Vocation-Computer Literary Instructor, D. ADAMS, Health Care Compliance Analyst (A), CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, M. MARKEL, Case Counselor (CCI), K. ROYAL, Custody Appeals Coordinator, L. DALBEC, Health Care Appeals Coordinator (A), D. JACOBSEN, Chief Medical Executive, K. J. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner, M. VOONG, Chief, Office of Appeals, T. LEMOS, A.D.A. Coordinator and J. KELLY, Psychologist |
| MICHAEL DWAYNE MAU, Jr. |
| 19-15877 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 04/30/2019). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11333804] (CKP) [Entered: 06/17/2019 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11281705] (CKP) [Entered: 04/30/2019 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Dwayne Mau Jr. opening brief due 06/24/2019. Appellees D. Adams, K. J. Allen, L. Dalbec, Clark E. Ducart, Warden, D. Jacobsen, J. Kelly, T. Lemos, M. Markel, M. Roberts, K. Royal and M. Voong answering brief due 07/23/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11278751] (HC) [Entered: 04/26/2019 12:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
