A. B., et al v. Chart Industries, Inc., et al
| PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER, PACIFIC MSO, LLC and PRELUDE FERTILITY, INC. |
| K. L., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, E. F., C. D., A. B., G. H. and I. J. |
| In re: PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER LITIGATION |
| SHERLENE WONG and LAWRENCE WONG |
| CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| 19-15885 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11314166] [19-15885, 19-15886, 19-15888] (BS) [Entered: 05/30/2019 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 10 Added attorney Adam Brett Wolf for G. H. I. J. A. B. K. L. C. D. E. F., in case 19-15885. [11313683] (NAC) [Entered: 05/30/2019 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Adam B. Wolf for Appellees A. B., C. D., E. F., G. H., I. J. and K. L.. Date of service: 05/30/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11313592] [19-15885] (Wolf, Adam) [Entered: 05/30/2019 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 Added attorney Adam Eric Polk for G. H. I. J. A. B. K. L. C. D. E. F., in case 19-15885. [11310459] (NAC) [Entered: 05/28/2019 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Adam E. Polk for Appellees A. B., C. D., E. F., G. H., I. J. and K. L.. Date of service: 05/28/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11310443] [19-15885] (Polk, Adam) [Entered: 05/28/2019 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added attorney Christina C. Sharp for G. H. I. J. A. B. K. L. C. D. E. F., in case 19-15885. [11308942] (NAC) [Entered: 05/24/2019 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christina C. Sharp for Appellees A. B., C. D., E. F., G. H., I. J. and K. L.. Date of service: 05/24/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11308939] [19-15885] (Sharp, Christina) [Entered: 05/24/2019 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/30/2019, 10:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11296114] [19-15885, 19-15886, 19-15888] (CL) [Entered: 05/14/2019 07:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/03/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11286727] (AD) [Entered: 05/03/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Chart Industries, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/03/2019. [11286159] [19-15885] (Peterson, Thomas) [Entered: 05/03/2019 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/03/2019. Transcript ordered by 05/23/2019. Transcript due 06/24/2019. Appellant Chart Industries, Inc. opening brief due 08/05/2019. Appellees A. B., C. D., E. F., G. H., I. J., K. L., Lawrence Wong and Sherlene Wong answering brief due 09/05/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11279220] (RT) [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
