John Henderson v. Fernando Tuvera, et al
STEVEN POSSON, P. HERNANDEZ, Health Care Appeals Coordinator, EDWARD M. BIRDSONG, Medical Doctor, J. VILLAFUERTE, Health Care Appeals Coordinator, NATIVIDAD MEDICAL CENTER, C. BOURNE, Medical Doctor and B. P. JACKSON, CHSA II |
JENNIFER R. SWINEY, Medical Doctor, GILES DUESDIEKER, Medical Doctor, FERNANDO TUVERA, Medical Doctor and REETIKA KIM KUMAR, Medical Doctor |
JOHN DELL HENDERSON, AKA Johndell Henderson, Jr. |
19-15933 |
May 2, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (EL, CMC and CTB) [11341927] (JFF) [Entered: 06/24/2019 10:49 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11315719] (WL) [Entered: 05/31/2019 02:23 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant John Dell Henderson opening brief due 06/28/2019. Appellees Giles Duesdieker, Reetika Kim Kumar, Jennifer R. Swiney and Fernando Tuvera answering brief due 07/29/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11284342] (HC) [Entered: 05/02/2019 09:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.