<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Raymond Whitall v. S.D. Gutierrez, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/19-17345</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/19-17345/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 09:15:15 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 09:15:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Raymond Whitall v. S.D. Gutierrez, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 4</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, MSB and DAB) [11555917] (JFF) [Entered: 01/09/2020 09:07 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_6589599</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARSHA S. BERZON and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11536700] (OC) [Entered: 12/18/2019 10:01 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_6589598</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Received copy of District Court order filed on 12/11/2019 Based solely on his affidavit of poverty, plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal (ECF No. 60) is GRANTED.. [11533920] (JFF) [Entered: 12/16/2019 02:56 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_6589597</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raymond Richard Whitall opening brief due 01/17/2020. Appellees J. Aboytes, J. Caballero, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, M. Gudino, S.D. Gutierrez, Shawn Hatton, Warden, William Muniz, Warden, J. Ramirez, State of California, F. Vasquez and A. Velasquez answering brief due 02/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11504680] (HC) [Entered: 11/19/2019 05:38 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_6033803</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
