Yolanda Banks-Reed, et al v. Joseph Mateu, III, et al
DOES, Bay Area Rapid Transit police officers DOES 1-50 inclusive, CARLOS ROJAS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department and BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, a municipal corporation |
YOLANDA BANKS-REED, individually, S.A.T., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Ciara Turner, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent SAHLEEM TINDLE, THE ESTATE OF SAHLEEM TINDLE, by and through its administrator LARON MAYFIELD and S.I.T., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Ciara Turner, individually, and as successor-in-interest to Decedent SAHLEEM TINDLE |
JOSEPH MATEU III, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department |
19-17444 |
December 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
YOLANDA BANKS-REED V. JOSEPH MATEU, III |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and MILAN D. SMITH, JR.) The emergency motion for a stay of district court proceedings (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [11574674] (OC) [Entered: 01/27/2020 09:45 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Joseph Mateu, III reply to response (). Date of service: 01/24/2020. [11574094] [19-17444] (Allen, Dale) [Entered: 01/24/2020 03:32 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees Yolanda Banks-Reed, S.A.T., S.I.T. and The Estate of Sahleem Tindle response opposing motion ([ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 01/21/2020. [11568524] [19-17444] (Burris, John) [Entered: 01/21/2020 02:00 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The court has received appellants emergency motion for a stay of district court proceedings. The response to the motion is due January 21, 2020. The optional reply in support of the motion is due January 24, 2020. [11562960] (OC) [Entered: 01/15/2020 10:05 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Joseph Mateu, III Motion for miscellaneous relief []. Date of service: 01/14/2020. [11562547] [19-17444] (Allen, Dale) [Entered: 01/14/2020 05:02 PM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 02/06/2020, 1:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11548993] (BLS) [Entered: 01/02/2020 12:02 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/12/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11530924]. [19-17444] (AD) [Entered: 12/12/2019 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Joseph Mateu, III Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/12/2019. [11530702] [19-17444] (Allen, Dale) [Entered: 12/12/2019 04:00 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joseph Mateu III Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/12/2019. Transcript ordered by 01/03/2020. Transcript due 02/03/2020. Appellant Joseph Mateu III opening brief due 03/13/2020. Appellees Yolanda Banks-Reed, S.A.T., S.I.T. and The Estate of Sahleem Tindle answering brief due 04/13/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11521946] (JBS) [Entered: 12/05/2019 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Yolanda Banks-Reed, et al v. Joseph Mateu, III, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: YOLANDA BANKS-REED, individually | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum Esquire |
Represented By: | Lateef Hasani Gray |
Represented By: | John L. Burris Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: S.A.T., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Ciara Turner, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent SAHLEEM TINDLE | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum Esquire |
Represented By: | Lateef Hasani Gray |
Represented By: | John L. Burris Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: THE ESTATE OF SAHLEEM TINDLE, by and through its administrator LARON MAYFIELD | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum Esquire |
Represented By: | Lateef Hasani Gray |
Represented By: | John L. Burris Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: S.I.T., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Ciara Turner, individually, and as successor-in-interest to Decedent SAHLEEM TINDLE | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum Esquire |
Represented By: | Lateef Hasani Gray |
Represented By: | John L. Burris Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DOES, Bay Area Rapid Transit police officers DOES 1-50 inclusive | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CARLOS ROJAS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, a municipal corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JOSEPH MATEU III, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department | |
Represented By: | Lori A. Sebransky |
Represented By: | Dale Long Allen Esquire Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.