Gallatin Wildlife Association, et al v. USFS, et al
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS |
REBISH/KONEN LIVESTOCK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HELLE LIVESTOCK, a partnership, AMERICAN SHEEP INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION and MONTANA WOOL GROWERS ASSOCIATION |
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester of the United States Forest Service |
GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION and YELLOWSTONE BUFFALO FOUNDATION |
19-35528 |
June 24, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION V. USFS |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [11403256] (LW) [Entered: 08/20/2019 09:37 AM] |
Filing 8 Received copy of Amended Notice of Appeal from district court filed on 7-8-2019. [11357791] (RT) [Entered: 07/09/2019 10:59 AM] |
Filing 7 Added attorney Michael Thomas Gray for United States Fish and Wildlife Service Leanne Marten USFS. [11354886] (RL) [Entered: 07/05/2019 10:44 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael Thomas Gray for Appellees Leanne Marten, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and USFS. Date of service: 07/05/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11354833] [19-35528] (Gray, Michael) [Entered: 07/05/2019 10:16 AM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Assessment Conference, 08/07/2019, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11353755] (LW) [Entered: 07/03/2019 01:02 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Gallatin Wildlife Association and Yellowstone Buffalo Foundation Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/01/2019. [11351398] [19-35528] (Meyer, John) [Entered: 07/01/2019 08:51 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/01/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11351366][19-35528] (AD) [Entered: 07/01/2019 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees Helle Livestock and Rebish/Konen Livestock Limited Partnership Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/01/2019. [11350818] [19-35528] (Hupp, Dana) [Entered: 07/01/2019 02:54 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/01/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/24/2019. Transcript due 08/23/2019. Appellants Gallatin Wildlife Association and Yellowstone Buffalo Foundation opening brief due 10/02/2019. Appellees American Sheep Industry Association, Helle Livestock, Leanne Marten, Montana Wool Growers Association, Rebish/Konen Livestock Limited Partnership, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and United States Forest Service answering brief due 11/01/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11342399] (JBS) [Entered: 06/24/2019 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.