Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. USEPA, et al
Defendant: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: TREASURE STATE RESOURCES ASSOCIATION OF MONTANA, THE MONTANA LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS, STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLEAN WATER AGENCIES
Plaintiff / Appellee: UPPER MISSOURI WATERKEEPER
Case Number: 19-35898
Filed: October 28, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 6, 2021 Summary Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v, United States Environmental Protection Agency

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 26, 2019 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant National Association of Clean Water Agencies response to Court order dated 10/31/2019. Date of service: 12/26/2019. [11544264] [19-35898] (Parr, Ashley) [Entered: 12/26/2019 12:27 PM]
November 5, 2019 Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN AssessmentConference, 11/22/2019, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11490074] (LW) [Entered: 11/05/2019 03:25 PM]
November 4, 2019 Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Ashley Parr for party(s) Appellant National Association of Clean Water Agencies, in case 19-35898. [11487863] (NAC) [Entered: 11/04/2019 01:03 PM]
November 4, 2019 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/04/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11487812]. [19-35898] (AD) [Entered: 11/04/2019 12:44 PM]
November 4, 2019 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ashley E. Parr (Barnes & Thornburg LLP, One N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4400, Chicago, IL 60606) for Appellant National Association of Clean Water Agencies. Date of service: 11/04/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11487803] [19-35898] (Parr, Ashley) [Entered: 11/04/2019 12:41 PM]
November 4, 2019 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant National Association of Clean Water Agencies Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/04/2019. [11487796] [19-35898] (Andes, Fred) [Entered: 11/04/2019 12:39 PM]
November 4, 2019 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Fredric P. Andes (Barnes & Thornburg LLP, One N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4400, Chicago, IL 60606) for Appellant National Association of Clean Water Agencies. Date of service: 11/04/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11487792] [19-35898] (Andes, Fred) [Entered: 11/04/2019 12:37 PM]
October 31, 2019 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CJ): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellants shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellants intend to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11485048] (TSP) [Entered: 10/31/2019 02:09 PM]
October 28, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants National Association of Clean Water Agencies and The Montana League of Cities and Towns Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/04/2019. Transcript ordered by 11/25/2019. Transcript due 12/24/2019. Appellants National Association of Clean Water Agencies and The Montana League of Cities and Towns opening brief due 02/03/2020. Appellee Upper Missouri Waterkeeper answering brief due 03/03/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11480238] (JBS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 02:41 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. USEPA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant / appellant: TREASURE STATE RESOURCES ASSOCIATION OF MONTANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant / appellant: THE MONTANA LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS
Represented By: Chad Eldon Adams
Represented By: Mary Christina Surr McCann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant / appellant: STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant / appellant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLEAN WATER AGENCIES
Represented By: Murry Warhank
Represented By: Fred Andes
Represented By: Ashley Parr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UPPER MISSOURI WATERKEEPER
Represented By: Janette K. Brimmer
Represented By: Stephanie Kathleen Tsosie Esquire
Represented By: Jenny K. Harbine
Represented By: Katherine Kirklin O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?