Albert Robinson v. San Bernardino County, et al
| UNKNOWN, Head of San Bernardino Public Defenders Office, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, DERRICK SMITH, CHRISTINA VILLALOBOS and BRANDON LOU |
| ALBERT ROBINSON |
| 19-55438 |
| April 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellees Brandon Lou, San Bernardino County, Derrick Smith and Christina Villalobos reply to response to order to show cause dated 04/30/2019. Date of service: 06/13/2019. [11330803] [19-55438] (Williams, Heidi) [Entered: 06/13/2019 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorneys Janine Leia Highiet-Ivicevic substituted by Attorneys Heidi K. Williams, [11319539] (JFF) [Entered: 06/04/2019 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Heidi K. Williams for Appellees Brandon Lou, San Bernardino County, Derrick Smith and Christina Villalobos. Substitution for Attorney Janine Leia Highiet-Ivicevic, Esquire for Appellees Brandon Lou, San Bernardino County, Derrick Smith and Christina Villalobos. Date of service: 06/04/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11319082] [19-55438] (Williams, Heidi) [Entered: 06/04/2019 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Albert Robinson response to order to show cause. [11320691] (JFF) [Entered: 06/05/2019 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the record suggests that this appeal may be appropriate for summary disposition under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-6(b) because the questions on which the decision in the appeal may be insubstantial as not to justify further proceedings. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). Within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall show cause why summary affirmance of the district courts March 22, 2019 order is not appropriate. A response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, this appeal will be automatically dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. [11282204] (CKP) [Entered: 04/30/2019 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Albert Robinson opening brief due 06/17/2019. Appellees Brandon Lou, San Bernardino County, Derrick Smith, Unknown and Christina Villalobos answering brief due 07/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11268482] (JPD) [Entered: 04/18/2019 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
