Onofre Roblero v. Daniel Paramo
| DANIEL PARAMO, Warden |
| ONOFRE ALVARADO ROBLERO |
| 19-55540 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Onofre Alvarado Roblero motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/22/2019. [11293811] (JPD) [Entered: 05/10/2019 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 01/30/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11293801] (JPD) [Entered: 05/10/2019 03:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Onofre Roblero v. Daniel Paramo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DANIEL PARAMO, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ONOFRE ALVARADO ROBLERO | |
| Represented By: | Onofre Alvarado Roblero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
