Martin Mondragon v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
UNKOWN PARTIES, All Persons Unknown Claiming Any Legal or Equitable Right Title Estate Lien or Interest in the Property Described in the Complaint Adverse to Plaintiffs Title or Any Cloud on Plaintiffs Title Thereto, RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, CRE HFS NHELOC, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, BANA CIG HFI 1ST LIENS GOV REW, DOES, 1-10, inclusive, NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., NEW AMERICAN FUNDING INC., GINNIE MAE and BANK OF AMERICA, NA |
MARTIN D. MONDRAGON |
19-56087 |
September 16, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
MARTIN MONDRAGON V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Streamlined request by Appellant Martin D. Mondragon to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Martin D. Mondragon opening brief due 12/09/2019. Appellees BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, BANA CIG HFI 1st Liens GOV REW, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, NA, Does, Fidelity National Title Company, Ginnie Mae, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., National Default Servicing Corporation, New American Funding Inc., ReconTrust Company, N.A. and Unkown Parties answering brief due 01/08/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11492883] (JN) [Entered: 11/07/2019 02:36 PM] |
Filing 7 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 09/18/2019. [11436236] (BY) [Entered: 09/18/2019 03:12 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11435516] (CKP) [Entered: 09/18/2019 10:54 AM] |
Filing 5 Terminated Nancy Franco for Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP in 19-56087 [11433232] (QDL) [Entered: 09/16/2019 04:29 PM] |
Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Douglas E. Winter for party(s) Appellee BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Appellee ReconTrust Company, N.A., Appellee Bank of America, N.A., Appellee Bank of America Corporation and Appellee MERS, in case 19-56087. [11433230] (QDL) [Entered: 09/16/2019 04:28 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Douglas E. Winter (Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, 1155 F Street, NW, Washington DC 20004) for Appellees BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., MERS and ReconTrust Company, N.A.. Substitution for Attorney Nancy Franco, Esquire for Appellees BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A.. Date of service: 09/16/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11433069] [19-56087] (Winter, Douglas) [Entered: 09/16/2019 03:41 PM] |
Filing 2 Terminated Nancy Franco for Does in 19-56087 [11432252] (JPD) [Entered: 09/16/2019 10:07 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Martin D. Mondragon opening brief due 11/08/2019. Appellees BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, BANA CIG HFI 1st Liens GOV REW, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Does, Fidelity National Title Company, Ginnie Mae, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., National Default Servicing Corporation, New American Funding Inc., ReconTrust Company, N.A. and Unkown Parties answering brief due 12/09/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11432241] (JPD) [Entered: 09/16/2019 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.