Oscar Segura v. Raymond Madden
OSCAR G. SEGURA |
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden |
19-56107 |
September 18, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN and JOHN B. OWENS): We have received and reviewed both parties responses to this courts September 19, 2019 order to show cause. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See 28 U.S.C. 2107, 2253(c)(2). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11494371] (AF) [Entered: 11/08/2019 02:32 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Raymond Madden reply to response to Court order dated 09/19/2019. Date of service: 10/15/2019. [11464420] [19-56107] (Boyd, Lindsay) [Entered: 10/15/2019 02:15 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Oscar G. Segura response to order to show cause. Served on 10/01/2019. [11458268] (CW) [Entered: 10/08/2019 02:51 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): The record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the request for certificate of appealability because appellant did not file a notice of appeal within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment on February 28, 2019, or within 30 days after entry of the district courts post-judgment order entered on May 31, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). Within 21 days after this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this request for certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this request for certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11437494] (AF) [Entered: 09/19/2019 02:02 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/30/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11436348] (OC) [Entered: 09/18/2019 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Oscar Segura v. Raymond Madden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: OSCAR G. SEGURA | |
Represented By: | Oscar G. Segura |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden | |
Represented By: | Lindsay Boyd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.