Barbara Stone v. USDC-AZT
| BARBARA STONE |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON |
| In re: BARBARA STONE |
| ROY R. LUSTIG |
| 19-71158 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [11299241] (OC) [Entered: 05/15/2019 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Barbara Stone motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/10/2019. [11295322] (HC) [Entered: 05/13/2019 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11295317] (HC) [Entered: 05/13/2019 02:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
