Tri Huynh v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware Corporation and WALMART.COM USA LLC, a Delaware Corporation |
TRI MINH HUYNH |
20-15211 |
February 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
TRI HUYNH V. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Streamlined request [3] by Appellant Mr. Tri Minh Huynh to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Tri Minh Huynh opening brief due 05/13/2020. Appellees Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.com USA LLC answering brief due 06/12/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11654949] (DLM) [Entered: 04/08/2020 08:21 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Tri Minh Huynh. New requested due date is 05/13/2020. [11654863] [20-15211] (Huynh, Tri) [Entered: 04/07/2020 07:12 PM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court filed 2/18/20. [11601646] (CW) [Entered: 02/19/2020 11:45 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tri Minh Huynh opening brief due 04/13/2020. Appellees Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.com USA LLC answering brief due 05/12/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11595937] (JBS) [Entered: 02/13/2020 09:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.