Wilbert Noble v. Derral Adams, et al
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden and STUART SHERMAN, Warden |
WILBERT NOBLE |
20-16569 |
August 14, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Deleted Incorrect Entry. See Correct Entry [ # 5 ]. [11853173] (RY) [Entered: 10/08/2020 04:39 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Appellants motion for a second extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by November 2, 2020. [11853080] (RY) [Entered: 10/08/2020 04:18 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Wilbert Noble Unopposed Motion to extend time to file COA request until 11/02/2020. Date of service: 10/08/2020. [11852448] [20-16569] (O'Connell, J.) [Entered: 10/08/2020 01:14 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NA): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by October 19, 2020. [11817947] (JBS) [Entered: 09/09/2020 03:03 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Wilbert Noble Motion to extend time to file COA request until 10/19/2020. Date of service: 09/08/2020. [11815578] [20-16569] (O'Connell, J.) [Entered: 09/08/2020 11:22 AM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 07/15/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11789852] (JMR) [Entered: 08/14/2020 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.