<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Eric Brink v. Patricia Herron, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-16697</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-16697/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 18:27:48 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 18:27:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Eric Brink v. Patricia Herron, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 3</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, JBR and MBC) [11855402] (NAC) [Entered: 10/13/2020 07:25 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_9775349</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11829801] (RT) [Entered: 09/18/2020 04:15 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_9775348</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eric Jay Brink opening brief due 10/30/2020. [11810665] (JMR) [Entered: 09/02/2020 11:08 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_9106873</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
