Sheryl Clark v. Transamerica Life Insurance Co
TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
SHERYL CLARK |
20-16756 |
September 11, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
SHERYL CLARK V. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CO |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11873469] (CL) [Entered: 10/27/2020 03:54 PM] |
Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellant Sheryl Clark to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Sheryl Clark opening brief due 12/09/2020. Appellee Transamerica Life Insurance Company answering brief due 01/08/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11866221] (JN) [Entered: 10/20/2020 04:45 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Sheryl Clark. New requested due date is 12/09/2020. [11866104] [20-16756] (Winters, Jack) [Entered: 10/20/2020 04:11 PM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 10/27/2020, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11850844] (CL) [Entered: 10/07/2020 12:24 PM] |
Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/16/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11826308]. [20-16756] (AD) [Entered: 09/16/2020 12:44 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Transamerica Life Insurance Company Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/16/2020. [11825764] [20-16756] (Golub, Larry) [Entered: 09/16/2020 09:48 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/06/2020, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11825536] (CL) [Entered: 09/16/2020 07:11 AM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/14/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11823731]. [20-16756] (AD) [Entered: 09/15/2020 06:44 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Sheryl Clark Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/14/2020. [11823686] [20-16756] (Winters, Jack) [Entered: 09/14/2020 09:19 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Sheryl Clark Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/18/2020. Appellant Sheryl Clark opening brief due 11/09/2020. Appellee Transamerica Life Insurance Company answering brief due 12/09/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11820125] (JMR) [Entered: 09/11/2020 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.