Alfred Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al
| UNKNOWN PARTY, police officer/FBI detective John Doe #1 at Phoenix Police Dept, STATE OF ARIZONA, JAMIE B. MARSHALL, X09122 Detective/Police Officer with x51 Squd and Squd C42 and the Phoenix Major Crimes Unit at the Phoenix Police Dept, CITY OF PHOENIX, DIANA C. RODRIGUEZ, WELLS FARGO BANK and PHOENIX POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| ALFRED E. CARAFFA |
| 20-16819 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa opening brief of 15 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 10/10/2020. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed (IFP motion pending). [11871026] (KWG) [Entered: 10/26/2020 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa notice requesting docket sheet and DC documents. [11871854] (RR) [Entered: 10/26/2020 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. . [11871843] (RR) [Entered: 10/26/2020 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11860592] (RR) [Entered: 10/15/2020 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11830818] (CKP) [Entered: 09/21/2020 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa opening brief due 11/16/2020. [11829834] (JPD) [Entered: 09/18/2020 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
