Richard Manriquez v. Joel Ensley, et al
| ANTHONY DORAN, TOWN OF SUPERIOR, a political subdivision and RICHARD H. MUELLER |
| BRYAN LAWRENCE and JOEL CHRISTIAN ENSLEY |
| RICHARD MANRIQUEZ |
| 20-16917 |
| October 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 42
MANDATE ISSUED.(DPC, KKL and JAO) [12545235] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2022 07:25 AM]
|
|
Filing 41
FILED OPINION (DANIEL P. COLLINS, KENNETH K. LEE and JILL OTAKE) We REVERSE the district courts denial of qualified immunity for Officer Lawrence and Officer Ensley on Count II, and REMAND to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Opinion by Judge Lee; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Otake. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12529190] (AKM) [Entered: 08/30/2022 08:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 40
Filed Audio recording of oral argument. Note: Video recordings of public argument calendars are available on the Court's website, at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ [12285526] (DLM) [Entered: 11/12/2021 11:02 AM]
|
|
Filing 39
ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO DANIEL P. COLLINS, KENNETH K. LEE and JILL OTAKE. [12284227] (DLM) [Entered: 11/10/2021 12:31 PM]
|
|
Filing 38
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AF): At the hearing, the parties should be prepared to discuss the impact, if any, of Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004), on this case. [12271006] (AF) [Entered: 10/27/2021 04:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 37
Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney James M. Jellison for Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. Hearing in Pasadena on 11/10/2021 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 10/11/2021. [12253022] [20-16917] (Jellison, James) [Entered: 10/11/2021 07:51 AM]
|
|
Filing 36
Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Martin A. Bihn for Appellee Richard Manriquez. Hearing in Pasadena on 11/10/2021 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 10/06/2021. [12249651] [20-16917] (Bihn, Martin) [Entered: 10/06/2021 02:40 PM]
|
|
Filing 35
Notice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - 10:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Check # here for updates on the status of reopening as the hearing date approaches. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Wednesday, November 10, 2021. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12248985]. [20-16917] (KS) [Entered: 10/06/2021 10:08 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
Notice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Check # here for updates on the status of reopening as the hearing date approaches. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Wednesday, November 10, 2021. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12214472]. [20-16917] (KS) [Entered: 08/29/2021 06:09 AM]
|
|
Filing 33
Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 31 ] filed by Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. (sent to panel) [12198374] (SD) [Entered: 08/11/2021 11:44 AM]
|
|
Filing 32
Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 31 ] submitted by Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12192617] (KWG) [Entered: 08/05/2021 08:35 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. Date of service: 08/04/2021. [12192500] [20-16917] (Jellison, James) [Entered: 08/04/2021 06:47 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 25 ] filed by Richard Manriquez. (Sent to panel). [12184199]--[Edited 07/27/2021 by CPA] (CPA) [Entered: 07/27/2021 12:47 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 24 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellee Richard Manriquez. (sent to panel) [12184171] (KWG) [Entered: 07/27/2021 12:33 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
Streamlined request [27] by Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence to extend time to file the brief is not approved because the case has been assigned to a panel. The filer needs to file a written motion. [12183282] (JN) [Entered: 07/26/2021 03:11 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. New requested due date is 09/07/2021. [12183241] [20-16917] (Jellison, James) [Entered: 07/26/2021 02:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
ENTRY UPDATED. Filed clerk order: The Court sua sponte grants appellee Richard Manriquez a 1 day extension of time to file the answering brief, which was not timely submitted. The answering brief [ # 25 ] submitted by Richard Manriquez is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 24 ] submitted by Richard Manriquez are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12177895] --[Edited: Updated docket text and attached amended order. 07/21/2021 by LA] (LA) [Entered: 07/20/2021 01:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Richard Manriquez. Date of service: 07/16/2021. [12175424] [20-16917]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 07/20/2021 by LA] (Bihn, Martin) [Entered: 07/17/2021 12:03 AM]
|
|
Filing 24
Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Richard Manriquez. Date of service: 07/16/2021. [12175423] [20-16917]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts, updated docket text to correct excerpts type. 07/20/2021 by LA] (Bihn, Martin) [Entered: 07/17/2021 12:01 AM]
|
|
Filing 23
Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 16 ] filed by Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. [12159676] (SD) [Entered: 06/30/2021 04:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 17 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Joel Christian Ensley. [12159020] (KWG) [Entered: 06/30/2021 11:44 AM]
|
|
Filing 21
Streamlined request [20] by Appellee Richard Manriquez to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Richard Manriquez answering brief due 07/16/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12144959] (DLM) [Entered: 06/15/2021 02:11 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Richard Manriquez. New requested due date is 07/15/2021. [12144815] [20-16917] (Bihn, Martin) [Entered: 06/15/2021 01:20 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12135369] (VS) [Entered: 06/07/2021 09:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 16 ] submitted by Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 17 ] submitted by Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12117812] (LA) [Entered: 05/19/2021 10:39 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. Date of service: 05/19/2021. [12117797] [20-16917]--[COURT UPDATE: Backdated entry to original submission date. 05/19/2021 by LA] (Jellison, James) [Entered: 05/19/2021 10:30 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. Date of service: 05/17/2021. [12115744] [20-16917]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief, removed excerpts (resubmitted in correct entry [ # 17 ]). 05/19/2021 by LA] (Jellison, James) [Entered: 05/17/2021 04:02 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
Streamlined request [14] by Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence opening brief due 05/17/2021. Appellee Richard Manriquez answering brief due 06/16/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12063513] (DLM) [Entered: 04/05/2021 11:49 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence. New requested due date is 05/17/2021. [12063421] [20-16917] (Jellison, James) [Entered: 04/05/2021 11:15 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellants' opening brief is due April 15, 2021; appellee's answering brief is due May 17, 2021; appellants' optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [12041015] (AF) [Entered: 03/15/2021 11:52 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellants' opening brief is due March 29, 2021; appellee's answering brief is due April 28, 2021; appellants' optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [12026475] (AF) [Entered: 03/05/2021 03:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellants' opening brief is due March 15, 2021; appellee's answering brief is due April 14, 2021; appellants' optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [11981627] (AF) [Entered: 01/26/2021 11:27 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - FurtherConference w/ appellee's counsel, 12/29/2020, 11:30 a.m. Pacific Time. [11937137] (MS) [Entered: 12/22/2020 02:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellants' opening brief is due February 12, 2021; appellee's answering brief is due March 15, 2021; appellants' optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [11935544] (AF) [Entered: 12/21/2020 03:40 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Conference w/ counsel for appellant , 12/21/2020, 1:00 p.m.,Pacific Time. See order for details. [11933186] (VS) [Entered: 12/18/2020 02:20 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Conference w/ counsel for appellant, 12/17/2020, 09:00 a.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [11925319] (VS) [Entered: 12/13/2020 03:03 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The video mediation originally scheduled for December 10, 2020, is rescheduled to December 11, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. In all other respects, this courts order dated November 2, 2020, remains in effect. [11903291] (AF) [Entered: 11/23/2020 12:09 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): A video mediation will be held on December 10, 2020, beginning at 9:00 A.M., Pacific Time. Counsel will receive an email from the Mediation Office in advance with instructions for participating in the conference. Unless excused by the Circuit Mediator in advance, each party shall be represented by counsel of record and a client representative having full authority to negotiate and settle the case. Brief, informal, confidential (not served on opposing counsel and not filed) mediation statements should be submitted to Circuit Mediator Robert Kaiser by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov ) on or before December 3, 2020. The mediation statements are an opportunity to provide insights into each partys goals and interests, potential impediments to settlement, past settlement discussions, and factors outside the litigation that might impact the parties approaches to settlement. The Circuit Mediator has full access to the appellate and district court dockets, so it is not necessary to repeat legal arguments nor attach copies of pleadings and orders. The mediation statements shall also provide the names and representative capacities of those who will attend the mediation. The mediation conference, like all other mediation communications, shall be confidential as provided in Circuit Rule 33-1. Participants should plan to be available the entire day to engage in meaningful settlement discussion. Counsel should review with their clients the information contained in the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation, with particular emphasis on section E Preparing for Mediation. [11879484] (AF) [Entered: 11/02/2020 04:07 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 10/30/2020, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11864367] (VS) [Entered: 10/19/2020 04:16 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/09/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11854998]. [20-16917] (AD) [Entered: 10/09/2020 06:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
Filed (ECF) Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/09/2020. [11854987] [20-16917] (Jellison, James) [Entered: 10/09/2020 06:34 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/09/2020. Transcript ordered by 11/02/2020. Transcript due 11/30/2020. Appellants Joel Christian Ensley and Bryan Lawrence opening brief due 01/11/2021. Appellee Richard Manriquez answering brief due 02/10/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11845475] (JBS) [Entered: 10/02/2020 11:26 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
