Ronald Cupp v. Andrew Smith, et al
| COUNTY OF SONOMA, MARK FRANCESCHI, TYRA HARRINGTON, ANDREW SMITH, TENNIS WICK and MARGARET WILLETT |
| RONALD CUPP |
| 20-16973 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LCC) On October 22, 2020, this court ordered appellant, within 21 days, either to move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The order warned appellant that failure to comply would result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk of the Court. To date, appellant has not complied with the courts October 22, 2020 order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as and for the mandate of this court. [11917150] (JMR) [Entered: 12/07/2020 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11869079] (JMR) [Entered: 10/22/2020 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [11868305] (LW) [Entered: 10/22/2020 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ronald Cupp Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/16/2020. Appellant Ronald Cupp opening brief due 12/07/2020. Appellees County of Sonoma, Mark Franceschi, Tyra Harrington, Andrew Smith, Tennis Wick and Margaret Willett answering brief due 01/06/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11853879] (JBS) [Entered: 10/09/2020 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
