Shikeb Saddozai v. Carlos Bolanos, et al
| SCOTT KIRKPATRICK, SAN MATEO COUNTY JAIL, SHERIFF OF SAN MATEO, CARLOS G. BOLANOS, Sheriff, MAGUIRE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SPENCER, Physician, San Mateo County Jail, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY and AMANDA, Nurse Practioner, San Mateo County Jail |
| SHIKEB SADDOZAI |
| 20-17488 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SHIKEB SADDOZAI V. CARLOS BOLANOS |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Streamlined request by Appellant Shikeb Saddozai to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 dayextensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Shikeb Saddozai opening brief due 05/03/2021. Appellees Amanda, Carlos G. Bolanos, Correctional Health Services, Scott Kirkpatrick, Maguire Correctional Facility, San Mateo County Jail, The City of Redwood City, Sheriff of San Mateo and Spencer answering brief due 06/02/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12005196] (DLM) [Entered: 02/16/2021 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND) A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is therefore unnecessary. Appellants motion for injunctive relief (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ] ) is denied. Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of this denial shall be filed or entertained. The opening brief is due April 1, 2021. The answering brief is due May 3, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. [12001242] (JPD) [Entered: 02/11/2021 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11992877] (CKP) [Entered: 02/04/2021 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 01/15/2021. [11980950] (NAC) [Entered: 01/25/2021 11:51 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Shikeb Saddozai motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11966549] (QDL) [Entered: 01/15/2021 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Shikeb Saddozai Form CJA 23 financial affidavit. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11966540] (QDL) [Entered: 01/15/2021 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 ENTRY UPDATED. ORIGINAL TEXT: Filed Appellant Shikeb Saddozai Form 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Served on 01/12/2021. [11966299]Filed Appellant Shikeb Saddozai motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/12/2021. [11966299]--[Edited 01/19/2021 by DJV] (DJV) [Entered: 01/15/2021 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Shikeb Saddozai motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Deficiencies: None [11962318] (NAC) [Entered: 01/13/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11954369] (CKP) [Entered: 01/06/2021 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shikeb Saddozai opening brief due 02/22/2021. Appellees Amanda, Sheriff of San Mateo and Spencer answering brief due 03/23/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11945638] (JPD) [Entered: 12/28/2020 09:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
