Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, MARK A. MORGAN, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, TONY H. PHAM, Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW |
| CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and PANGEA LEGAL SERVICES |
| 20-17490 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/03/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11950169]. [20-17490] (AD) [Entered: 01/03/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants William P. Barr, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Executive Office for Immigration Review, James McHenry, Mark A. Morgan, Tony H. Pham, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, USDHS and Chad F. Wolf Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/03/2021. [11950165] [20-17490] (Reuveni, Erez) [Entered: 01/03/2021 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The appeal filed December 23, 2020 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than January 20, 2021; the answering brief is due February 17, 2021 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [11946355] (AF) [Entered: 12/28/2020 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction. C.R. 3-3. [11945756] (RT) [Entered: 12/28/2020 10:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
