Ramil Serrano v. Jeffrey Uttecht, et al
| STATE OF WASHINGTON |
| RAMIL A. SERRANO |
| JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden |
| 20-35215 |
| March 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and KENNETH K. LEE): The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11684173] (AF) [Entered: 05/07/2020 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. [11624932] (RT) [Entered: 03/10/2020 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/20/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. (Electronic: PACER) [11624660] (RT) [Entered: 03/10/2020 12:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
