Daniel Wells, Jr. v. Jeffrey Uttecht

Daniel Wells, Jr. v. Jeffrey Uttecht

Respondent / Appellee:	JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:	DANIEL LEE WELLS, Jr.
Case Number:	20-35377
Filed:	April 30, 2020
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
June 11, 2020	Filing 2 Filed order (STEPHEN S. TROTT and N. RANDY SMITH) The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11718997] (JMR) [Entered: 06/11/2020 02:09 PM]
April 30, 2020	Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/01/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11676959] (JPD) [Entered: 04/30/2020 01:47 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

June 11, 2020

Filing 2 Filed order (STEPHEN S. TROTT and N. RANDY SMITH) The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11718997] (JMR) [Entered: 06/11/2020 02:09 PM]

April 30, 2020

Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/01/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11676959] (JPD) [Entered: 04/30/2020 01:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Wells, Jr. v. Jeffrey Uttecht
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DANIEL LEE WELLS, Jr.
Represented By:	Daniel Lee Wells Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?