Stacey Grove v. Terema Carlin
Petitioner / Appellant: STACEY LEWIS GROVE
Respondent / Appellee: TEREMA CARLIN, Warden
Case Number: 20-35471
Filed: May 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Stacey Lewis Grove Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 07/01/2020. [11739761] [20-35471] (Benjamin, Dennis) [Entered: 07/01/2020 12:30 PM]
May 29, 2020 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/28/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11704802] (JMR) [Entered: 05/29/2020 09:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stacey Grove v. Terema Carlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: STACEY LEWIS GROVE
Represented By: Dennis Alan Benjamin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: TEREMA CARLIN, Warden
Represented By: L. LaMont Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?