Keith Brown v. Keith Yordy, et al
BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE IDOC, LEE, Sergeant, BRIAN KLINGENSMITH, KEITH YORDY, Warden, JEFF ZAMUDA, Director of the Idaho State Department of Corrections, RAMIREZ, Sergeant, KEVIN KEMPF, CORIZON INC., COMMISSION ON PARDONS AND PAROLES, JAY CHRISTIANSON, SEELY, Sergeant and RANDY BLADES, Warden |
KEITH A. BROWN |
20-35889 |
October 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, SANDRA S. IKUTA and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the September 30, 2020 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable by the plaintiff-appellant. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all of the claims or parties in action is not immediately appealable unless the district court directs entry of a judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also Mathis v. County of Lyon, 633 F.3d 877, 878 (9th Cir. 2011) (grant of qualified immunity not subject to interlocutory review). DISMISSED. [11900082] (JPD) [Entered: 11/19/2020 04:24 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Keith A. Brown opening brief due 12/14/2020. Appellees Kevin Kempf, Lee, Ramirez, Seely, Keith Yordy, Warden and Jeff Zamuda answering brief due 01/11/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11856428] (JPD) [Entered: 10/13/2020 01:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.