<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Jonathan Rodriguez v. Brigitte Amsberry, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-36028</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-36028/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 05:32:26 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 05:32:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Jonathan Rodriguez v. Brigitte Amsberry, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 3</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, ADH and BSB) [11952775] (RR) [Entered: 01/05/2021 12:07 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_10631493</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11926715] (WL) [Entered: 12/14/2020 02:53 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_10631492</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jonathan Jason Rodriguez opening brief due 01/25/2021. [11907801] (JPD) [Entered: 11/27/2020 12:09 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_10123503</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
