David Goldstine v. FedEx Freight, Inc., et al
| DOES, 1-100 and CORPORATIONS |
| DAVID GOLDSTINE |
| FEDEX FREIGHT, INC., a Washington State entity |
| 20-36095 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 02/18/2021. See order for details. [11968143] (LW) [Entered: 01/19/2021 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of timely filed motions listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motions. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motions, appellant shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11955622] (TSP) [Entered: 01/07/2021 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN Assessment Conference, 01/19/2021, 1:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11947488] (LW) [Entered: 12/29/2020 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/28/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11946757]. [20-36095] (AD) [Entered: 12/28/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant FedEx Freight, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/28/2020. [11946608] [20-36095] (Marisseau, Medora) [Entered: 12/28/2020 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Brett Elliott for party(s) Appellant FedEx Freight, Inc., in case 20-36095. [11936774] (NAC) [Entered: 12/22/2020 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Brett Ashley Elliott (Karr Tuttle Campbell, 701 5th Avenue, Suite 3300, Seattle, Washington 98104) for Appellant FedEx Freight, Inc.. Date of service: 12/22/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11936765] [20-36095] (Elliott, Brett) [Entered: 12/22/2020 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Entered appearance of Court Reporter Nancy Lynn Bauer in this case. [11935616] (JPD) [Entered: 12/21/2020 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Goldstine Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/28/2020. Transcript ordered by 01/19/2021. Transcript due 02/16/2021. Appellant David Goldstine opening brief due 03/29/2021. Appellee FedEx Freight, Inc. answering brief due 04/27/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. (Edited to reflect correct party designation on appeal) [11935053] (JPD) [Entered: 12/21/2020 01:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
