<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>The Estate of Bryan Carreno, et al v. County of Santa Barbara, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-55185</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-55185/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026 16:20:28 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2026 16:20:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>The Estate of Bryan Carreno, et al v. County of Santa Barbara, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 5</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LK) Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11635024] (JPD) [Entered: 03/19/2020 09:47 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_7527508</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed (ECF) Appellants A. C., Nicholas Carreno, Stella Carreno and The Estate of Bryan Carreno Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 03/18/2020. [11633715]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [3].] (SLM) [Entered: 03/18/2020 11:08 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_7527507</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellants A. C., Nicholas Carreno, Stella Carreno and The Estate of Bryan Carreno reply to response to Court order dated 02/27/2020. Date of service: 03/18/2020. [11633640] [20-55185] (Schmidt, William) [Entered: 03/18/2020 10:47 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_7527506</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11611791] (JPD) [Entered: 02/27/2020 04:26 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_7026259</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants A. C., Nicholas Carreno, Stella Carreno and The Estate of Bryan Carreno Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/28/2020. Appellants A. C., Nicholas Carreno, Stella Carreno and The Estate of Bryan Carreno opening brief due 04/22/2020. Appellees Bill Brown, Joshua Cockrell, County of Santa Barbara, Robert DeBarge, Does, Shane Moore, Kenneth Rushing, Santa Barbara County Sheriffs Office and Dustin Winebrenner answering brief due 05/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11605393] (RT) [Entered: 02/21/2020 04:40 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_7026258</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
