<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Pamela Bennett, et al v. Cielo Homeowners Association,, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-55576</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/20-55576/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:18:03 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:18:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Pamela Bennett, et al v. Cielo Homeowners Association,, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 5</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED. (SPG, KMW and RDN) [11756384] (QDL) [Entered: 07/17/2020 09:53 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_8762940</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 17 Jul 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RYAN D. NELSON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); Joseph v. Office of the Consulate Gen. of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1028 (9th Cir. 1987) (district courts grant of motion to set aside default judgment is not final, appealable order). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11733606] (JMR) [Entered: 06/25/2020 01:08 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_8762939</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed Appellant Pamela Rae Bennett motion to stay appellate proceedings. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/15/2020. [11727966] (QDL) [Entered: 06/19/2020 03:15 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_8762938</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed Appellant Pamela Rae Bennett motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/12/2020. [11723746] (QDL) [Entered: 06/16/2020 02:06 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_8762937</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Pamela Rae Bennett opening brief due 08/04/2020. Appellees Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc, Does, James Arthur Judge, David Mangikyan and The Judge Law Firm answering brief due 09/04/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11708502] (RT) [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:33 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_7955388</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
