Joseph Kishore, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
| GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California, official capacity and ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, official capacity |
| JOSEPH KISHORE, Socialist Equality Party candidate for U.S. President and NORISSA SANTA CRUZ, Socialist Equality Party candidate for U.S. Vice President |
| 20-55748 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 08/07/2020. [11781965] [20-55748] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 08/07/2020 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) Appellants motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ]) is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [11778032] (OC) [Entered: 08/05/2020 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz motion for reconsideration of non-dispositive Judge Order of 07/27/2020. Date of service: 08/03/2020. [11775991] [20-55748] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 08/03/2020 09:48 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact Circuit Mediator to discuss services available through the Circuit Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11775510] (CL) [Entered: 08/03/2020 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 7 ] submitted by Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 8 ] submitted by Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11774609] (KT) [Entered: 08/03/2020 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz. Date of service: 07/31/2020. [11774022] [20-55748] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 07/31/2020 11:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz. Date of service: 07/31/2020. [11774021] [20-55748] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 07/31/2020 11:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/28/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11770019]. [20-55748] (AD) [Entered: 07/28/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/28/2020. [11769967] [20-55748] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 07/28/2020 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) The motion to expedite (Docket Entry No. [11765957-2}) is denied. In light of the late date of the appeal, it cannot be calendared for resolution prior to August 26, 2020. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [11767936] (TSP) [Entered: 07/27/2020 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joseph Kishore and Norissa Santa Cruz EMERGENCY Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 07/24/2020. [11765957] [20-55748] (Seabaugh, Thomas) [Entered: 07/24/2020 06:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed July 22, 2020 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than August 19, 2020; the answering brief is due September 16, 2020 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [11765116] (OC) [Entered: 07/24/2020 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [11763409] (JBS) [Entered: 07/23/2020 11:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joseph Kishore, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California, official capacity | |
| Represented By: | Peter H. Chang |
| Represented By: | Amie L. Medley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, official capacity | |
| Represented By: | Peter H. Chang |
| Represented By: | Amie L. Medley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JOSEPH KISHORE, Socialist Equality Party candidate for U.S. President | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Carter Seabaugh |
| Represented By: | Donald G. Norris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: NORISSA SANTA CRUZ, Socialist Equality Party candidate for U.S. Vice President | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Carter Seabaugh |
| Represented By: | Donald G. Norris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
