Sara Kelley, et al v. San Diego County Health, et al
| ALICIA ROGERS, VALESHA BULLOCK, JESSICA AYALA, NICK MACCHIONE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, MARGO FUDGE, VALERIE HILLS, MYRNA MURILLO and WENDY CURIEL |
| TERESA L. SMITH and SARA M. KELLEY |
| 20-56111 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SARA KELLEY V. SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (JW): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellants' opening brief is due January 15, 2021; appellees' answering brief is due February 16, 2021; appellants' optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [11894502] (AF) [Entered: 11/16/2020 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/09/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11887437]. [20-56111] (AD) [Entered: 11/09/2020 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency, Jessica Ayala, Valerie Hills, Margo Fudge, Myrna Murillo, Alicia Rogers, Wendy Curiel, Valesha Bullock and Nick Macchione Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/09/2020. [11886562] [20-56111] (Miyamoto, Jeffrey) [Entered: 11/09/2020 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 11/13/2020, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11877127] (BLS) [Entered: 10/30/2020 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/26/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11871570]. [20-56111] (AD) [Entered: 10/26/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Sara M. Kelley and Teresa L. Smith Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/26/2020. [11871444] [20-56111] (Kelley, Sara) [Entered: 10/26/2020 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Sara M. Kelley and Teresa L. Smith Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/28/2020. Appellants Sara M. Kelley and Teresa L. Smith opening brief due 12/21/2020. Appellees Jessica Ayala, Valesha Bullock, Wendy Curiel, Margo Fudge, Valerie Hills, Nick Macchione, Myrna Murillo, Alicia Rogers and San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency answering brief due 01/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11867736] (JMR) [Entered: 10/21/2020 04:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
