Does 1-16 v. USDHS, et al
| TONY H. PHAM, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT |
| DOES, 1 through 16, inclusive |
| 20-56234 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 Filed Audio recording of oral argument. Note: Video recordings of public argument calendars are available on the Court's website, at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ [11972973] (TG) [Entered: 01/20/2021 07:11 PM] |
| Filing 32 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and ROBERT S. LASNIK. [11965687] (KJC) [Entered: 01/15/2021 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Kirk Pasich for Appellant Does. Hearing in San Francisco on 01/15/2021 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: 3). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 01/04/2021. [11950639] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 01/04/2021 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 30 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. James Cottrell Graulich, III, Esquire for Appellees Tony H. Pham, USDHS, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Chad F. Wolf. Hearing in San Francisco on 01/15/2021 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 3). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15.) Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 12/31/2020. [11949489] [20-56234] (Graulich, James) [Entered: 12/31/2020 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 29 Notice of Oral Argument on Friday, January 15, 2021 - 09:00 A.M. Pacific - Scheduled Location: Courtroom 3 - San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location, even if the argument is fully remote. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument may be held remotely with judges and attorneys appearing by video or telephone. Travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Friday, January 15, 2021. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [11948095] (AW) [Entered: 12/29/2020 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 28 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 20 ] filed by Does. [11945134] (SD) [Entered: 12/24/2020 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 27 Deleted Incorrect Entry [11945097] (SD) [Entered: 12/24/2020 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 26 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 18 ] filed by Appellees. [11945094] (SD) [Entered: 12/24/2020 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 25 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS and BRIDGET S. BADE): Appellants motion to expedite briefing in this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is denied as moot. Briefing is complete. The alternate request for injunctive relief is denied. Appellants motion to expedite calendaring of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 22 ]) is granted in part. The Clerk will place this appeal on the calendar for January 2021. See 9th Cir. Gen. Order 3.3(g). [11944823] (AF) [Entered: 12/24/2020 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does response to motion ([ # 22 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 22 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to expedite case). Date of service: 12/23/2020. [11938543] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 12/23/2020 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 23 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 20 ] submitted by Does is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11937608] (LA) [Entered: 12/22/2020 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 12/22/2020. [11937601] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 12/22/2020 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 21 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does response to motion ([ # 8 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 8 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 12/22/2020. [11937596] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 12/22/2020 05:26 PM] |
| Filing 20 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Does. Date of service: 12/22/2020. [11937512] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 12/22/2020 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 19 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 18 ] submitted by appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11937035] (LA) [Entered: 12/22/2020 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 18 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, USDHS and Chad F. Wolf. Date of service: 12/21/2020. [11935979] [20-56234] (Graulich, James) [Entered: 12/21/2020 07:38 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 12/09/2020. [11920380] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 12/09/2020 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 16 Added Attorney(s) Arianna M. Young for party(s) Appellant Does, in case 20-56234. [11919883] (CW) [Entered: 12/09/2020 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Arianna Marie Young (Pasich LLP - 10880 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 2000, Los Angeles, CA 90024) for Appellant Does. Date of service: 12/09/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11919874] [20-56234] (Young, Arianna) [Entered: 12/09/2020 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 14 Added Attorney(s) James Cottrell Graulich III for party(s) Appellee Chad F. Wolf Appellee USDHS Appellee Tony H. Pham Appellee United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in case 20-56234. [11919762] (CW) [Entered: 12/09/2020 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of James C. Graulich (US Department of Justice-Office of Immigration Litigation, P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station, Washington D.C. 20044) for Appellees Tony H. Pham, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, USDHS and Chad F. Wolf. Substitution for Paul B. Green, Esquire for Appellees Tony H. Pham, USDHS, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Chad F. Wolf and Jasmin Yang for Appellees Tony H. Pham, USDHS, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Chad F. Wolf. Date of service: 12/09/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11919601] [20-56234] (Graulich, James) [Entered: 12/09/2020 06:54 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does reply to response (). Date of service: 12/02/2020. [11912243] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 12/02/2020 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellees USDHS, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Chad F. Wolf response opposing motion ([ # 8 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 8 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 12/01/2020. [11911578] [20-56234] (Green, Paul) [Entered: 12/01/2020 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 10 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 3 ] filed by Does. [11907662] (SD) [Entered: 11/27/2020 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 9 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 4 ] in 4 volume(s) filed by Appellant Does. [11907091] (LA) [Entered: 11/25/2020 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 11/24/2020. [11905779] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 11/24/2020 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does Amended Motion to take judicial notice of Documents In Support of Appellants' Opening Brief. Date of service: 11/24/2020. [11905761] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 11/24/2020 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 3 ] submitted by Does is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 4 ] submitted by Does are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11905084] (KT) [Entered: 11/24/2020 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Does Motion to take judicial notice of Documents in Support of Appellants' Opening Brief. Date of service: 11/23/2020. [11904394] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 11/23/2020 09:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Does. Date of service: 11/23/2020. [11904392] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 11/23/2020 08:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Does. Date of service: 11/23/2020. [11904390] [20-56234] (Pasich, Kirk) [Entered: 11/23/2020 08:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed November 20, 2020 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than December 18, 2020; the answering brief is due January 15, 2021 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31- 2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [11903661] (WL) [Entered: 11/23/2020 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [11902866] (RT) [Entered: 11/23/2020 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
