Silverado Hospice, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II
SILVERADO HOSPICE, INC., a Delaware corporation and PROCARE HOSPICE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation |
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services |
20-56348 |
December 18, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Added Attorney(s) Alisa Beth Klein, McKaye Lea Neumeister for party(s) Appellee Alex M. Azar II. [11996787] (RL) [Entered: 02/08/2021 04:54 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of McKaye Lea Neumeister (U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Room 7231, Washington, DC 20530) for Appellee Alex M. Azar, II. Date of service: 02/08/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11996761] [20-56348] (Neumeister, McKaye) [Entered: 02/08/2021 04:47 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Alisa B. Klein (U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Appellate, 950 Pennsylvania Ave. NW room 7235, Washington DC 20530) for Appellee Alex M. Azar, II. Date of service: 02/08/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11996757] [20-56348] (Klein, Alisa) [Entered: 02/08/2021 04:46 PM] |
Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [11970095] (VS) [Entered: 01/20/2021 04:06 PM] |
Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellants ProCare Hospice, LLC and Silverado Hospice, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants ProCare Hospice, LLC and Silverado Hospice, Inc. opening brief due 03/22/2021. Appellee Alex M. Azar II answering brief due 04/21/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11963222] (JN) [Entered: 01/14/2021 08:08 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Silverado Hospice, Inc. and ProCare Hospice, LLC. New requested due date is 03/22/2021. [11962965] [20-56348] (Halgren, Matthew) [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:34 PM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 01/19/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11951129] (VS) [Entered: 01/04/2021 01:17 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Silverado Hospice, Inc. and ProCare Hospice, LLC Correspondence: Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 10-3.1(c), Providing Copy of Notice Filed in District Court Stating that No Transcripts of Oral Proceedings Will Be Ordered. Date of service: 12/29/2020 [11947757] [20-56348] (Halgren, Matthew) [Entered: 12/29/2020 02:53 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/28/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11946082]. [20-56348] (AD) [Entered: 12/28/2020 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants ProCare Hospice, LLC and Silverado Hospice, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/28/2020. [11945659] [20-56348] (Daucher, Brian) [Entered: 12/28/2020 09:44 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants ProCare Hospice, LLC and Silverado Hospice, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/28/2020. Appellants ProCare Hospice, LLC and Silverado Hospice, Inc. opening brief due 02/18/2021. Appellee Alex M. Azar II answering brief due 03/18/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11932888] (RT) [Entered: 12/18/2020 11:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Silverado Hospice, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: SILVERADO HOSPICE, INC., a Delaware corporation | |
Represented By: | Brian McCracken Daucher |
Represented By: | Matthew G. Halgren |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: PROCARE HOSPICE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation | |
Represented By: | Brian McCracken Daucher |
Represented By: | Matthew G. Halgren |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of United States Department of Health and Human Services | |
Represented By: | Karen Paik |
Represented By: | McKaye Lea Neumeister |
Represented By: | Alisa Beth Klein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.