Andrew Kowalczyk v. USDC-AZT
| ANDREW FRANKLIN KOWALCZYK |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON |
| BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, Warden, JOHN DOES, 1-25, JANE DOES, 1-25, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and In re: ANDREW FRANKLIN KOWALCZYK |
| 20-73607 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Further, the petition was filed by John Kowalczyk, father of petitioner, but John Kowalczyk has made no showing of authority to act on behalf of petitioner. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(b) (upon motion, court may permit action to be continued by partys representative if party becomes incompetent). Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be accepted in this closed case. DENIED. [11925251] (OC) [Entered: 12/11/2020 06:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE PETITIONER AND COUNSEL FOR REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11922315] (HH) [Entered: 12/10/2020 11:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
