Andrew Kowalczyk v. USDC-AZT
| ANDREW FRANKLIN KOWALCZYK |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON |
| BARBARA BLANCKENSEE, Warden (USP Tucson), JOHN DOES, 1-25, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, In re: ANDREW FRANKLIN KOWALCZYK and JANE DOES, 1-25, in thier individual and official capacities |
| 20-73727 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED.. [11935479] (WL) [Entered: 12/21/2020 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILEDEMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11934077] (BY) [Entered: 12/21/2020 07:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
