William Rouser v. D. Crounse, et al
| DANIELLE R. HEMPLE, W. J. SULLIVAN, D. CROUNSE and S. VASQUEZ |
| WILLIAM ROUSER |
| 21-15037 |
| January 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed with minor deficiency original and 0 copies of Appellant William Rouser opening brief of 4 pages (Informal: No). Served on 02/04/2021. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Minor deficiency: multiple opening briefs. [11993387] (KWG) [Entered: 02/04/2021 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 ENTRY UPDATED. ORIGINAL TEXT: Filed Appellant William Rouser Form 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/13/2021. [11974986] [11974986]--[Edited 01/22/2021 by DJV] (DJV) [Entered: 01/21/2021 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant William Rouser notice of appeal , motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11959535] (JFF) [Entered: 01/11/2021 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant William Rouser opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 01/03/2021. [11959398] (LA) [Entered: 01/11/2021 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11958059] (CKP) [Entered: 01/10/2021 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant William Rouser opening brief due 03/08/2021. [11956024] (JMR) [Entered: 01/07/2021 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
